Madison v. Reichelt

267 F.2d 942
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 16, 1959·No. No. 7646·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs applied to the Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners of Prince George’s County, Maryland, for a permit to construct a restaurant building. The permit was issued and the work had proceeded almost to completion, when it was discovered that the property in question was located in a portion of Prince George’s County known as the Maryland-Washington Regional District, in respect to which (unlike other areas of the County) building permits are issuable, not by the Commissioners’ Clerk, but only by the Building Inspector, and by him only with the approval of the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission as to zoning, etc. The site is located in a residential zone and the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission refused to rezone. The plaintiffs sued the County Commissioners for damages and the District Court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss. For the reasons fully stated in the District Court’s opinion, 158 F.Supp. 401, its action is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Madison v. Reichelt, 267 F.2d 942 (4th Cir. 1959).

267 F.2d 942 (Madison v. Reichelt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Madison v. Reichelt
267 F.2d 942 (Fourth Circuit, 1959)