Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Maddrie v. McDonough

Maddrie v. McDonough

933 So. 2d 579, 2006 WL 1566055
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 9, 2006·No. 1D06-0881·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

933 So.2d 579 (2006)

Stephen MADDRIE, Appellant,
v.
James R. McDONOUGH and Aramark Corporation, Appellees.

No. 1D06-0881.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 9, 2006.
Rehearing Denied July 14, 2006.

*580 Stephen Maddrie, pro se, Appellant.

Charlie Crist, Attorney General, and Sean F. Callaghan, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee; Louis A. Vargas, General Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.110(l); Benton v. Moore, 655 So.2d 1272, 1273 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). In light of the dismissal of this appeal, all pending motions are denied as moot.

KAHN, C.J., ERVIN, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maddrie v. McDonough, 933 So. 2d 579, 2006 WL 1566055 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

933 So. 2d 579 (Maddrie v. McDonough) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Maddrie v. McDonough
945 So. 2d 573 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)