Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Maddrie v. McDonough

Maddrie v. McDonough

933 So. 2d 579, 2006 WL 1566055
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 9, 2006
Docket1D06-0881
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 933 So. 2d 579 (Maddrie v. McDonough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maddrie v. McDonough, 933 So. 2d 579, 2006 WL 1566055 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

933 So.2d 579 (2006)

Stephen MADDRIE, Appellant,
v.
James R. McDONOUGH and Aramark Corporation, Appellees.

No. 1D06-0881.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 9, 2006.
Rehearing Denied July 14, 2006.

*580 Stephen Maddrie, pro se, Appellant.

Charlie Crist, Attorney General, and Sean F. Callaghan, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee; Louis A. Vargas, General Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.110(l); Benton v. Moore, 655 So.2d 1272, 1273 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). In light of the dismissal of this appeal, all pending motions are denied as moot.

KAHN, C.J., ERVIN, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Maddrie v. McDonough
945 So. 2d 573 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
933 So. 2d 579, 2006 WL 1566055, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maddrie-v-mcdonough-fladistctapp-2006.