Henry v. Finta

559 So. 2d 434, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2419, 1990 WL 41588
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 11, 1990·No. No. 90-0569·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner attempts to seek certiorari jurisdiction over an order granting a motion for judgment on the pleadings after having first filed a notice of appeal from the order. Such an order is neither a non-final appealable order, Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130, nor a final ap-pealable order. Russell v. Russell, 507 So.2d 661 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). Furthermore, petitioner fails to allege any of the necessary requirements to obtain extraordinary writ jurisdiction. The petition is therefore denied.

WALDEN, STONE and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henry v. Finta, 559 So. 2d 434, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2419, 1990 WL 41588 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

559 So. 2d 434 (Henry v. Finta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Maddrie v. McDonough
945 So. 2d 573 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)