Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Henry v. Finta

Henry v. Finta

559 So. 2d 434, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2419, 1990 WL 41588
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 11, 1990
DocketNo. 90-0569
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 559 So. 2d 434 (Henry v. Finta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Henry v. Finta, 559 So. 2d 434, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2419, 1990 WL 41588 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner attempts to seek certiorari jurisdiction over an order granting a motion for judgment on the pleadings after having first filed a notice of appeal from the order. Such an order is neither a non-final appealable order, Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130, nor a final ap-pealable order. Russell v. Russell, 507 So.2d 661 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). Furthermore, petitioner fails to allege any of the necessary requirements to obtain extraordinary writ jurisdiction. The petition is therefore denied.

WALDEN, STONE and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Maddrie v. McDonough
945 So. 2d 573 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
559 So. 2d 434, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2419, 1990 WL 41588, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henry-v-finta-fladistctapp-1990.