Maddox v. State
This text of Maddox v. State (Maddox v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-14-0001108 15-JUL-2016 09:34 AM
SCWC-14-0001108
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI
MICKEY A. MADDOX, Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant,
vs.
STATE OF HAWAIʻI, Respondent/Respondent-Appellee.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-14-0001108; CAAP-14-0001109; SPECIAL PROCEEDING PRISONER NO. 13-1-0004 (CRIMINAL NOS. 07-1-0139 and 09-1-0284))
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Petitioner/Petitioner Appellant’s Application for Writ
of Certiorari, filed on June 1, 2016, is hereby accepted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be
heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move
for retention of oral argument.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, July 15, 2016.
Mickey A. Maddox /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald petitioner pro se /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Maddox v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maddox-v-state-haw-2016.