Maddox v. State

Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided July 15, 2016·No. SCWC-14-0001108·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-14-0001108 15-JUL-2016 09:34 AM

SCWC-14-0001108

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

MICKEY A. MADDOX,

Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant,

vs.

STATE OF HAWAIʻI,

Respondent/Respondent-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-14-0001108; CAAP-14-0001109;

SPECIAL PROCEEDING PRISONER NO. 13-1-0004 (CRIMINAL NOS. 07-1-0139 and 09-1-0284))

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Petitioner Appellant’s Application for Writ

of Certiorari, filed on June 1, 2016, is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be

heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant

to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move

for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, July 15, 2016.

Mickey A. Maddox /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald petitioner pro se /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maddox v. State, (haw 2016).

Maddox v. State (Maddox v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.