Madani v. Kendall Ford, Inc.

794 P.2d 1250, 102 Or. App. 478, 5 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 937, 1990 Ore. App. LEXIS 690
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided July 18, 1990·No. 16-87-02515; CA A49072·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinions

[480]*480DEITS, J.

Plaintiff appeals a judgment for defendants in his action for wrongful discharge, intentional infliction of emotional distress and breach of contract. He assigns as errors the court’s dismissal of his claims for wrongful discharge and intentional infliction of emotional distress for failure to state claims, ORCP 21A(8), and its granting of a directed verdict for Kendall Ford1 on his claim for breach of contract. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.

The facts are set out in Judge Newman’s concurring and dissenting opinion. We reverse and remand the dismissal of the intentional infliction of emotional distress claim and the directed verdict on the breach of contract claim for the reasons set out in that opinion.

For the reasons stated in Judge Richardson’s concurrence, we affirm the dismissal of plaintiff s wrongful discharge claim.

Reversed and remanded on claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress and breach of contract; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Madani v. Kendall Ford, Inc., 794 P.2d 1250, 102 Or. App. 478, 5 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 937, 1990 Ore. App. LEXIS 690 (Or. Ct. App. 1990).

794 P.2d 1250 (Madani v. Kendall Ford, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Haskins v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.
811 F. Supp. 534 (D. Oregon, 1992)
Madani v. Kendall Ford, Inc.
818 P.2d 930 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1991)
Coulter v. Construction & General Laborers Union Local 320
812 P.2d 850 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1991)
Petty v. Rogue Federal Credit Union
809 P.2d 121 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1991)
Carlson v. Crater Lake Lumber Co.
796 P.2d 1216 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1990)
Madani v. Kendall Ford, Inc.
794 P.2d 1250 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1990)