MacY's, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

844 F.3d 188, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 20682, 2016 WL 6832944
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in MacY's, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board. Read the opinion of the Court — 824 F.3d 557
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 18, 2016·No. 15-60022·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

Treating the petition for rehearing en banc as a petition for panel rehearing, the petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. The court having been polled at the request of one of its members, and a majority of the judges who are in regular active service and not disqualified not having voted in favor (Fed. R. App. P. 35 and 5th Cir. R. 35), the petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.

In the en banc poll, 6 judges voted in favor of rehearing (Judges Jolly, Jones, Smith, Clement, Owen, and Elrod), and 9 judges voted against rehearing (Chief Judge Stewart and Judges Davis, Dennis, Prado, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, Hig-ginson, and Costa).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MacY's, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 844 F.3d 188, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 20682, 2016 WL 6832944 (5th Cir. 2016).

844 F.3d 188 (MacY's, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related