Macon v. Murray

81 S.E.2d 126, 240 N.C. 116, 1954 N.C. LEXIS 637
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedApril 7, 1954
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 81 S.E.2d 126 (Macon v. Murray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Macon v. Murray, 81 S.E.2d 126, 240 N.C. 116, 1954 N.C. LEXIS 637 (N.C. 1954).

Opinion

Pee. Cueiam.

As the pleadings on which the case was tried have been omitted from the record, in violation of the requirements of Rule 19, Section 1 of the Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 221 N.C. 544, at page 553, the appeal must be dismissed in accordance with the uniform practice in such cases. See S. v. Lumber Co., 207 N.C. 47, 175 S.E. 713, and cases cited. See also Ins. Co. v. Bullard, 207 N.C. 652, 178 S.E. 113; Goodman v. Goodman, 208 N.C. 416, 181 S.E. 328; Bank v. McCullers, 211 N.C. 327, 190 S.E. 217; Washington County v. Land Co., 222 N.C. 637, 24 S.E. 2d 338; Ericson v. Ericson, 226 N.C. 474, 38 S.E. 2d 517; S. v. Jenkins, 234 N.C. 112, 66 S.E. 819; Smoak v. Newton, 234 N.C. 451, 67 S.E. 2d 462; Allen v. Allen, 235 N.C. 554, 70 S.E. 2d 505. “We can judicially know only what properly appears on the record,” Stacy, C. J., in S. v. Lumber Co., supra.

In the absence of agreement of parties, it is not now deemed expedient to supply the deficiency by reference to records on former appeals.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thrush v. Thrush
94 S.E.2d 897 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1956)
Griffin v. Barnes
87 S.E.2d 560 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
81 S.E.2d 126, 240 N.C. 116, 1954 N.C. LEXIS 637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/macon-v-murray-nc-1954.