Allen v. Allen

70 S.E.2d 505, 235 N.C. 554, 1952 N.C. LEXIS 429
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMay 7, 1952
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 70 S.E.2d 505 (Allen v. Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allen v. Allen, 70 S.E.2d 505, 235 N.C. 554, 1952 N.C. LEXIS 429 (N.C. 1952).

Opinion

DeNny, J.

The affidavit, summons, and pleadings of the plaintiff are not set forth in the transcript of the record, docketed in this Court, as required by Rule 19, sec. 1, of our Rules of Practice, 221 N.C. at page 553. The pleadings are an essential part of the record in order that we may be advised as to the nature of the action or proceeding. Insurance Co. v. Bullard, 207 N.C. 652, 178 S.E. 113.

Moreover, in a summary proceeding in ejectment the “oath in writing,” required by G.S. 42-28, must allege certain essential facts in order to confer jurisdiction. Howell v. Branson, 226 N.C. 264, 37 S.E. 2d 687. Therefore, the omission of these essential parts of the transcript, as required by our Rules, is fatal to the appeal. Ericson v. Ericson, 226 N.C. 474, 38 S.E. 2d 517; Washington County v. Land Co., 222 N.C. 637, 24 S.E. 2d 338; Bank v. McCullers, 211 N.C. 327, 190 S.E. 217; Insurance Co. v. Bullard, supra; S. v. Lumber Co., 207 N.C. 47, 175 S.E. 713; Waters v. Waters, 199 N.C. 667, 155 S.E. 564; Plott v. Construction Co., [555]*555198 N.C. 782, 153 S.E. 396; Schwarberg v. Howard, 197 N.C. 126, 147 S.E. 741. “Failure to send up necessary parts of the record proper has uniformly resulted in dismissal of the appeal.” Goodman v. Goodman, 208 N.C. 416, 181 S.E. 328; Payne v. Brown, 205 N.C. 785, 172 S.E. 348; Riggan v. Harrison, 203 N.C. 191, 165 S.E. 358; Pruitt v. Wood, 199 N.C. 788, 156 S.E. 126.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Clark
369 S.E.2d 607 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1988)
Mooneyham v. Mooneyham
107 S.E.2d 66 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1959)
Macon v. Murray
81 S.E.2d 126 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
70 S.E.2d 505, 235 N.C. 554, 1952 N.C. LEXIS 429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-v-allen-nc-1952.