Macon v. Commissioner
This text of 7 B.T.A. 450 (Macon v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[451]*451OPINION.
At the date of trial of this proceeding, petitioner failed to appear and his counsel stated that without his testimony no evidence could be introduced in support of the first and second assignments of error. No reason was offered for the nonappearance of petitioner and no motion made for a continuance of the hearing. Concerning the first and second assignments of error, the determination of the respondent is sustained.
We have decided in R. Downes, Jr., v. Commissioner, 5 B. T. A., 1029, that where a man and wife living in Louisiana, filed a joint return and included therein the income of both, they could not subsequently file a return on a separate basis under the community property law. This proceeding falls squarely within that decision.
Judgment will be .entered for the respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 B.T.A. 450, 1927 BTA LEXIS 3175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/macon-v-commissioner-bta-1927.