Macon, Dublin & Savannah Railroad v. Wood
59 S.E. 595, 3 Ga. App. 197, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 592
Opinion
A mule grazing in a field thirty or forty feet from the railroad track suddenly ran on the track, a few feet in front of an engine and ears running thirty miles an hour. On seeing the mule approaching the track, the engineer, according to his undisputed testimony, did-everything in his power to avoid killing or injuring the mule, hut his efforts were unavailing. Eeld, that the killing of the mule was an unavoidable accident, and the verdict against the railroad company was without evidence to support it. Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Macon, Dublin & Savannah Railroad v. Wood, 59 S.E. 595, 3 Ga. App. 197, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 592 (Ga. Ct. App. 1907).
59 S.E. 595 (Macon, Dublin & Savannah Railroad v. Wood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. Forester
157 S.E. 924 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)
Tuggle v. Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co.
113 S.E. 36 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Chastain
84 S.E. 167 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)
Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. O'Neal
75 S.E. 674 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1912)
Macon, Dublin & Savannah Railroad v. Hamilton
70 S.E. 1126 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1911)
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Roberts
67 S.E. 690 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1910)