Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. Forester

157 S.E. 924, 43 Ga. App. 66, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 177
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 31, 1931·No. 20985·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Bloodwobtii, J.

"The statutory presumption of negligence, arising on proof of the killing by the running of the locomotive and ears of the railroad company, was fully rebutted by positive and uncontradicted evidence, and the verdict for the plaintiff was contrary to law. The judge of the superior court erred in overruling the certiorari. Macon & Birmingham R. Co. v. Revis, 119 Ga. 332 [46 S. E. 418]; Macon, Dublin & Savannah R. Co. v. Wood, 3 Ga. App. 197 [59 S. E. 595].” Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. O’Neal, 11 Ga. App. 461 (75 S. E. 674) ; Alabama Great Southern R. Co. v. Capeley, 39 Ga. App. 98 (146 S. E. 326).

Judgment -reversed.

Broyles, O. J., and Dulce, J., concur. B. T. Brock, Maddox, Sapp & Maddox, for plaintiff in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. Forester, 157 S.E. 924, 43 Ga. App. 66, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 177 (Ga. Ct. App. 1931).

157 S.E. 924 (Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. Forester) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hildebrand v. Chicago B. & Q. R. R.
17 P.2d 651 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1933)