Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. Forester
This text of 157 S.E. 924 (Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. Forester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
"The statutory presumption of negligence, arising on proof of the killing by the running of the locomotive and ears of the railroad company, was fully rebutted by positive and uncontradicted evidence, and the verdict for the plaintiff was contrary to law. The judge of the superior court erred in overruling the certiorari. Macon & Birmingham R. Co. v. Revis, 119 Ga. 332 [46 S. E. 418]; Macon, Dublin & Savannah R. Co. v. Wood, 3 Ga. App. 197 [59 S. E. 595].” Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. O’Neal, 11 Ga. App. 461 (75 S. E. 674) ; Alabama Great Southern R. Co. v. Capeley, 39 Ga. App. 98 (146 S. E. 326).
Judgment -reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
157 S.E. 924, 43 Ga. App. 66, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alabama-great-southern-railroad-v-forester-gactapp-1931.