Macmillan Co. v. United States

116 F. 1018, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 5068
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided May 31, 1902·No. No. 3,142·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge

(orally). The Macmillan Company made an arrangement with the English authors and owners of the copyright of “Cleland and Mackay’s Anatomy” that the book should be copyrighted in this country. They had set up and copyrighted the first 64 pages, when, the book being about to appear in England, it was found to be impossible to set up the remainder in time to secure copyright. The first 64 pages were therefore printed from the copyright portion which was set up in this country, and the remainder of the book was imported in sheets, and, when received, was bound up with the 64 pages that had been printed here. The collector assessed [1019] duty on the imported sheets at 25 per cent, ad valorem, under paragraph 311, Act 1894, as “printed matter.”

Paragraph 410 in the free list of the same statute reads as follows:

“410. Books, engravings, photographs, bound or unbound, etchings, music, maps and charts, which shall have been printed more than twenty years * *• * and all * * * scientific books and periodicals devoted to original scientific research,” etc.

Concededly, this “Anatomy” is a scientific book. It was held in Re Hempstead (C. C.) 95 Fed. 967, that the word “book” in the paragraph above quoted was broad enough to cover the printed sheets unbound, and it would seem that these sheets did not cease to be a book because some few pages at the beginning or end were wanting.

The decision of the board is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Macmillan Co. v. United States, 116 F. 1018, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 5068 (circtsdny 1902).

116 F. 1018 (Macmillan Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

R. D. Manufacturing Corp. v. United States
58 C.C.P.A. 14 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1970)
R D Manufacturing Corp. v. United States
62 Cust. Ct. 421 (U.S. Customs Court, 1969)
United States v. Field
14 Ct. Cust. 376 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1927)
Petry Co. v. United States
5 Ct. Cust. 524 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1915)
Downing v. United States
130 F. 393 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1903)