Maclay v. Bunkers

46 Iowa 700
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided April 20, 1877·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Rothrock, J.

I. It is not claimed in the argument of counsel for appellant that this proceeding is in the nature of an equitable action, and triable anew in this court. If, however, the issues are of an equitable character there can be no trial de novo here, because it appears that the cause was tried in the court below upon oral evidence taken in open court, and it does not appear that anv motion was made for a trial upon written evidence, or that the court caused the evidence offered on the trial to be taken down in writing and certified by the judge, as required by Sec. 2742 of the Code.

In this condition of the record we can only try the legal errors duly presented. Code, Sec. 2741. There must be a compliance with the requirements of Sec. 2742, to entitle parties to a trial anew of equitable actions in this court.

II. There are no errors assigned by appellants. It is necessary that there should be in order to have a trial upon error. This court can only regard errors which are assigned. Code, Sec. 3207.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maclay v. Bunkers, 46 Iowa 700 (iowa 1877).

46 Iowa 700 (Maclay v. Bunkers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

County of Woodbury v. Lambert
1 N.W. 670 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1879)
Lentzinger v. Hershey
47 Iowa 696 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1878)
Vinsant v. Vinsant
47 Iowa 594 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1877)