Lentzinger v. Hershey
This text of 47 Iowa 696 (Lentzinger v. Hershey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
No errors are assigned, nor was there a motion in the court below for a trial on written evidence, nor did the court order all the evidence to be taken in the form of depositions, or that the evidence offered at the trial should be reduced to writing, nor has the judge certified that all the evidence is before us. In this state of the record there is nothing we can try or determine. Code, § 2742; MacClay v. Bunkers, 46 Iowa, 700; Richards v. Hintrager, 45 Id., 253; Hammersham v. Fairall, 44 Iowa, 462; Vinsant v. Vinsant, p. 594, ante.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
47 Iowa 696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lentzinger-v-hershey-iowa-1878.