MacK v. Youmans

Supreme Court of Georgia

MacK v. Youmans

184 S.E.2d 648, 228 Ga. 223, 1971 Ga. LEXIS 525

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedOctober 21, 1971

Docket26649

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 184 S.E.2d 648 (MacK v. Youmans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

MacK v. Youmans, 184 S.E.2d 648, 228 Ga. 223, 1971 Ga. LEXIS 525 (Ga. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Felton, Justice.

1. Waiver of counsel and the voluntary, intelligent entry of guilty pleas, cannot be presumed from a silent record, but must be affirmatively shown by the record, or by an allegation and evidence. Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U. S. 238 (89 SC 1709, 23 LE2d 274); Purvis v. Connell, 221 Ga. 764 (182 SE2d 892).

2. The record is otherwise silent as to the two above-mentioned acts of the accused and no such affirmative showing as is now required was supplied by affidavits of the trial judge and a state probation officer who was present at the trial in his official capacity, which affidavits were illegally admitted in evidence and considered on the habeas corpus hearing because they were filed some two months after the hearing (although prior to the judgment) and were not served on appellant, who, therefore, could not make any countershowing thereto.

3. Since the guilty plea was not shown to have been intelligently and voluntarily entered, the sentence under which the petitioner is serving is invalid and therefore his detention is unlawful. Accordingly, the judgment remanding him to the custody of the Warden of the Public Works Camp of Screven County is reversed with direction that the plea of guilty and sentence be vacated and that further proceedings be consistent with this opinion.

Judgment reversed with direction.

All the Justices concur. *224 Percy J. Blount, for appellant. Harry H. Hunter, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Felton, Justice.

1. Waiver of counsel and the voluntary, intelligent entry of guilty pleas, cannot be presumed from a silent record, but must be affirmatively shown by the record, or by an allegation and evidence. Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U. S. 238 (89 SC 1709, 23 LE2d 274); Purvis v. Connell, 221 Ga. 764 (182 SE2d 892).

2. The record is otherwise silent as to the two above-mentioned acts of the accused and no such affirmative showing as is now required was supplied by affidavits of the trial judge and a state probation officer who was present at the trial in his official capacity, which affidavits were illegally admitted in evidence and considered on the habeas corpus hearing because they were filed some two months after the hearing (although prior to the judgment) and were not served on appellant, who, therefore, could not make any countershowing thereto.

3. Since the guilty plea was not shown to have been intelligently and voluntarily entered, the sentence under which the petitioner is serving is invalid and therefore his detention is unlawful. Accordingly, the judgment remanding him to the custody of the Warden of the Public Works Camp of Screven County is reversed with direction that the plea of guilty and sentence be vacated and that further proceedings be consistent with this opinion.

Judgment reversed with direction.

All the Justices concur. *224 Percy J. Blount, for appellant. Harry H. Hunter, for appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

184 S.E.2d 648, 228 Ga. 223, 1971 Ga. LEXIS 525, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mack-v-youmans-ga-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack