Grant v. Ault

188 S.E.2d 799, 228 Ga. 864, 1972 Ga. LEXIS 936
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided April 6, 1972·No. 27082·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Grice, Presiding Justice.

Where as here, the evidence upon the habeas corpus proceeding authorized the finding that the petitioner was represented by competent counsel, and the record affirmatively shows that the petitioner was fully advised of his rights and voluntarily and intelligently entered a plea of guilty, the judgment remanding him to custody of the respondent was not error. Compare Laidler v. Smith, 227 Ga. 759 (182 SE2d 891); Purvis v. Connell, 227 Ga. 764 (182 SE2d 892); Mack v. Yeomans, 228 Ga. 223 (184 SE2d 648).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grant v. Ault, 188 S.E.2d 799, 228 Ga. 864, 1972 Ga. LEXIS 936 (Ga. 1972).

188 S.E.2d 799 (Grant v. Ault) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Huff v. Barnett
197 S.E.2d 345 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1973)