Mack v. State
251 So. 2d 893
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mack v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 5740 →
Opinion
The appellant was tried before the court without a jury and found guilty of the sale of heroin. The proof of appellant’s guilt was overwhelming. On this appeal he claims two procedural errors. Each ruling urged as error was within the sound judicial discretion of the trial judge and error has not been demonstrated. See Floyd v. State, Fla.1956, 90 So.2d 105; Matera v. State, Fla.App.1969, 218 So.2d 180.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mack v. State, 251 So. 2d 893 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).
251 So. 2d 893 (Mack v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matera v. State
218 So. 2d 180 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
Floyd v. State
90 So. 2d 105 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1956)