Mack v. State

270 So. 2d 382, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 5740
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 12, 1972·No. No. 72-592·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant-appellant, Anthony Eugene Mack, seeks reversal of his conviction and sentence after being found guilty on the charge of carrying a concealed firearm. Two police officers stopped defendant after noticing a suspicious bulge in his right pocket. The officers seized a revolver from defendant and subsequently an information was filed charging him with carrying a concealed firearm in violation of F.S. § 790.01, F.S.A. Pursuant to the trial court’s adjudication defendant was sentenced to sixty (60) days in the Dade County Jail.

On appeal it is contended that the trial judge deprived defendant of a fair trial by repeatedly displaying a lack of neutrality toward defendant. No objections, however, were made at trial to any of the alleged incidents of misconduct. Since the errors complained of by defendant are [383] not fundamental they cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. Dickenson v. State, Fla.App. 1972, 261 So.2d 561; Scarpati v. State, Fla.App.1969, 224 So.2d 335; Mahone v. State, Fla.App.1969, 222 So.2d 769; Worthington v. State, Fla.App.1966, 183 So.2d 728.

Accordingly, the judgment and sentence herein appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mack v. State, 270 So. 2d 382, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 5740 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

270 So. 2d 382 (Mack v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nichols v. State
721 So. 2d 807 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Jones v. State
582 So. 2d 110 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
J.G. v. State
544 So. 2d 316 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Scott v. State
396 So. 2d 271 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Meggett v. State
362 So. 2d 713 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)