Mack v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

251 A.D.2d 1083, 675 N.Y.S.2d 575, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7206
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 10, 1998·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted the motion of defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company for summary judgment dismissing the complaint in this action in which plaintiff seeks to recover no-fault benefits from her insurance carrier. Having previously elected an arbitration forum, plaintiff waived her right to commence an action based upon claims arising out of the same accident (see, Roggio v Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 66 NY2d 260, 263-264; Gibeault v Home Ins. Co., 221 AD2d 826, 827). The court also properly denied plaintiffs cross motion to compel arbitration. Plaintiff voluntarily withdrew her demand for arbitration upon settlement by the parties of the issues before the arbitrator, [1084]*1084and plaintiff has identified no additional issues subject to arbitration. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Major, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Pine, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Pigott, Jr., and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mack v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance, 251 A.D.2d 1083, 675 N.Y.S.2d 575, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7206 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

251 A.D.2d 1083 (Mack v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cortez v. Countrywide Insurance
17 A.D.3d 508 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Bradberry v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
11 A.D.3d 1002 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Gaul v. American Employers' Insurance
302 A.D.2d 875 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)