Bradberry v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bradberry v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

11 A.D.3d 1002, 782 N.Y.S.2d 387, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11460

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 1, 2004·No. Appeal No. 1·Published

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Amy J. Fricano, J.), entered September 24, 2003. The order granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint in an action to recover damages for breach of contract.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs (see Roggio v Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 66 NY2d 260 [1985]; Mack v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 251 AD2d 1083 [1998]; Rockaway Blvd. Med. v Progressive Ins. Co., 2003 NY Slip Op 50938 [U]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Amy J. Fricano, J.), entered September 24, 2003. The order granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint in an action to recover damages for breach of contract.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs (see Roggio v Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 66 NY2d 260 [1985]; Mack v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 251 AD2d 1083 [1998]; Rockaway Blvd. Med. v Progressive Ins. Co., 2003 NY Slip Op 50938 [U]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.

Bradberry v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance, 11 A.D.3d 1002, 782 N.Y.S.2d 387, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11460 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

11 A.D.3d 1002 (Bradberry v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related