Bradberry v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

11 A.D.3d 1002, 782 N.Y.S.2d 387, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11460
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 1, 2004
DocketAppeal No. 1
StatusPublished

This text of 11 A.D.3d 1002 (Bradberry v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bradberry v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance, 11 A.D.3d 1002, 782 N.Y.S.2d 387, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11460 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Amy J. Fricano, J.), entered September 24, 2003. The order granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint in an action to recover damages for breach of contract.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs (see Roggio v Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 66 NY2d 260 [1985]; Mack v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 251 AD2d 1083 [1998]; Rockaway Blvd. Med. v Progressive Ins. Co., 2003 NY Slip Op 50938 [U]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Roggio v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
487 N.E.2d 261 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
Mack v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
251 A.D.2d 1083 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 A.D.3d 1002, 782 N.Y.S.2d 387, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bradberry-v-state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-nyappdiv-2004.