Mack J. Wall v. E. Wilson Purdy, Director of Public Safety, Dade County, Fla.

465 F.2d 933
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided September 7, 1972·No. 71-1388·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

The order of the district court, 321 F.Supp. 367, denying habeas corpus relief to the appellant is vacated, and the cause is remanded with directions to determine whether the appellant was advised of his right to counsel and whether he voluntarily and intelligently waived1 that right in connection with his said trial. If there was no valid waiver of appellant’s Sixth Amendment right to counsel, then he is entitled either to have his conviction and sentence of imprisonment set aside or, if the respondent should desire to retry him for the offense, to his Sixth Amendment rights to counsel in the event, on retrial, the court might contemplate a sentence of imprisonment. Argersinger v. Hamlin, 1972, 407 U.S. 25, 92 S.Ct. 2006, 32 L.Ed. 530.

Vacated and remanded, with directions.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mack J. Wall v. E. Wilson Purdy, Director of Public Safety, Dade County, Fla., 465 F.2d 933 (5th Cir. 1972).

465 F.2d 933 (Mack J. Wall v. E. Wilson Purdy, Director of Public Safety, Dade County, Fla.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Salt Lake City v. Grotepas
906 P.2d 890 (Utah Supreme Court, 1995)
Stokes v. Singletary
952 F.2d 1567 (Eleventh Circuit, 1992)