MacIntyre v. State

625 So. 2d 118, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10485, 1993 WL 407973
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 15, 1993·No. No. 92-2805·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

HARRIS, Chief Judge.

Scott MacIntyre pled no contest to a charge of aggravated assault in exchange for a promise of three years’ probation with no jail time. As conditions of his probation, the trial court prohibited MacIntyre from consuming any alcohol and from entering any bar or liquor lounge without permission from his probation officer. MacIntyre argues on appeal that, because these conditions are not related to the crime involved, they are invalid. We agree.

Nothing in the record indicates the consumption of alcohol had^anything to do with this assault. We therefore reverse as to the alcohol related conditions based on the reasoning set forth in our recent opinion in Grate v. State, 623 So.2d 591 (Fla. 5th DCA1993).

REVERSED as to the alcohol related conditions of probation.

PETERSON and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MacIntyre v. State, 625 So. 2d 118, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10485, 1993 WL 407973 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

625 So. 2d 118 (MacIntyre v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jones v. State
890 So. 2d 537 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Leverock v. State
627 So. 2d 1354 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Belhomme v. Rigal Plastics, Inc.
625 So. 2d 118 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)