Belhomme v. Rigal Plastics, Inc.
This text of 625 So. 2d 118 (Belhomme v. Rigal Plastics, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Franz R. BELHOMME, Appellant,
v.
RIGAL PLASTICS, INC., etc., Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Jeffrey A. Ville of Burger & Ville, Indian Harbour Beach, for appellant.
Randall M. Bolinger of Rissman, Weisberg, Barrett & Hurt, P.A., Orlando, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The order of summary final judgment in favor of Rigal Plastics, Inc. is hereby reversed because we find that a material issue of fact exists regarding whether Regal's removal of a safety device was substantially certain to result in appellant's injuries. See Cunningham v. Anchor Hocking Corp., 558 So.2d 93 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 574 So.2d 139 (Fla. 1990).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
W. SHARP, GOSHORN and PETERSON, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
625 So. 2d 118, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10534, 1993 WL 407971, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/belhomme-v-rigal-plastics-inc-fladistctapp-1993.