Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Belhomme v. Rigal Plastics, Inc.

Belhomme v. Rigal Plastics, Inc.

625 So. 2d 118, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10534, 1993 WL 407971
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 15, 1993·No. 92-2689·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

625 So.2d 118 (1993)

Franz R. BELHOMME, Appellant,
v.
RIGAL PLASTICS, INC., etc., Appellee.

No. 92-2689.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

October 15, 1993.

Jeffrey A. Ville of Burger & Ville, Indian Harbour Beach, for appellant.

Randall M. Bolinger of Rissman, Weisberg, Barrett & Hurt, P.A., Orlando, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The order of summary final judgment in favor of Rigal Plastics, Inc. is hereby reversed because we find that a material issue of fact exists regarding whether Regal's removal of a safety device was substantially certain to result in appellant's injuries. See Cunningham v. Anchor Hocking Corp., 558 So.2d 93 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 574 So.2d 139 (Fla. 1990).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

W. SHARP, GOSHORN and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Belhomme v. Rigal Plastics, Inc., 625 So. 2d 118, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10534, 1993 WL 407971 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

625 So. 2d 118 (Belhomme v. Rigal Plastics, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Myrick v. Luhrs Corp.
689 So. 2d 416 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
JB Coxwell Contracting, Inc. v. Shafer
663 So. 2d 659 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)