Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Machado v. State

Machado v. State

812 So. 2d 610, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 4974, 2002 WL 561725
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 17, 2002
DocketNo. 3D01-1951
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 812 So. 2d 610 (Machado v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Machado v. State, 812 So. 2d 610, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 4974, 2002 WL 561725 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Appellant/defendant Gustavo Machado (“Machado”) appeals the trial court’s order denying his motion for post-conviction relief. Machado claims he is entitled to jail credit from the time Dade County issued the order to transport him from Broward County jail until he actually arrived in Dade County to face violation of probation charges. Upon the State’s proper confession of error, we reverse and remand for recalculation of defendant’s credit for time served. See Daniels v. State, 491 So.2d 543 (Fla.1986).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Torres v. State
812 So. 2d 610 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
812 So. 2d 610, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 4974, 2002 WL 561725, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/machado-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.