Machado v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Machado v. State

812 So. 2d 610, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 4974, 2002 WL 561725

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 17, 2002·No. No. 3D01-1951·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Appellant/defendant Gustavo Machado (“Machado”) appeals the trial court’s order denying his motion for post-conviction relief. Machado claims he is entitled to jail credit from the time Dade County issued the order to transport him from Broward County jail until he actually arrived in Dade County to face violation of probation charges. Upon the State’s proper confession of error, we reverse and remand for recalculation of defendant’s credit for time served. See Daniels v. State, 491 So.2d 543 (Fla.1986).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Appellant/defendant Gustavo Machado (“Machado”) appeals the trial court’s order denying his motion for post-conviction relief. Machado claims he is entitled to jail credit from the time Dade County issued the order to transport him from Broward County jail until he actually arrived in Dade County to face violation of probation charges. Upon the State’s proper confession of error, we reverse and remand for recalculation of defendant’s credit for time served. See Daniels v. State, 491 So.2d 543 (Fla.1986).

Reversed and remanded.

Machado v. State, 812 So. 2d 610, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 4974, 2002 WL 561725 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

812 So. 2d 610 (Machado v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related