MacDonald v. R.A. Investments Ltd.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

MacDonald v. R.A. Investments Ltd.

830 So. 2d 916, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17135, 2002 WL 31557707

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 20, 2002

DocketNo. 4D02-1022

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 830 So. 2d 916 (MacDonald v. R.A. Investments Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

MacDonald v. R.A. Investments Ltd., 830 So. 2d 916, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17135, 2002 WL 31557707 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final judgment of the circuit court granting default judgment in favor of appellee, R.A. Investments Limited and against appellants Merrill and Raymond MacDonald. The final judgment requires appellants, as sellers, to perform certain preliminary acts called for in the contract between the parties for the sale of real property located in the Bahamas. As appellee conceded at oral argument, the final judgment does not purport to, and cannot, require the transfer of title to, or the conveyance of, property located in the Bahamas. See Ruth v. Dep’t of Legal Affairs, 684 So.2d 181 (Fla.1996); State, Dep’t of Natural Res. v. Antioch Univ., 583 So.2d 869, 872 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); McMullen v. McMullen, 122 So.2d 626 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960).

AFFIRMED.

KLEIN, STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final judgment of the circuit court granting default judgment in favor of appellee, R.A. Investments Limited and against appellants Merrill and Raymond MacDonald. The final judgment requires appellants, as sellers, to perform certain preliminary acts called for in the contract between the parties for the sale of real property located in the Bahamas. As appellee conceded at oral argument, the final judgment does not purport to, and cannot, require the transfer of title to, or the conveyance of, property located in the Bahamas. See Ruth v. Dep’t of Legal Affairs, 684 So.2d 181 (Fla.1996); State, Dep’t of Natural Res. v. Antioch Univ., 583 So.2d 869, 872 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); McMullen v. McMullen, 122 So.2d 626 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960).

AFFIRMED.

KLEIN, STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

830 So. 2d 916, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17135, 2002 WL 31557707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/macdonald-v-ra-investments-ltd-fladistctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack