MacDonald v. R.A. Investments Ltd.

830 So. 2d 916, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17135, 2002 WL 31557707
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 20, 2002·No. No. 4D02-1022·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final judgment of the circuit court granting default judgment in favor of appellee, R.A. Investments Limited and against appellants Merrill and Raymond MacDonald. The final judgment requires appellants, as sellers, to perform certain preliminary acts called for in the contract between the parties for the sale of real property located in the Bahamas. As appellee conceded at oral argument, the final judgment does not purport to, and cannot, require the transfer of title to, or the conveyance of, property located in the Bahamas. See Ruth v. Dep’t of Legal Affairs, 684 So.2d 181 (Fla.1996); State, Dep’t of Natural Res. v. Antioch Univ., 583 So.2d 869, 872 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); McMullen v. McMullen, 122 So.2d 626 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960).

AFFIRMED.

KLEIN, STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MacDonald v. R.A. Investments Ltd., 830 So. 2d 916, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17135, 2002 WL 31557707 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

830 So. 2d 916 (MacDonald v. R.A. Investments Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

BMW Financial Services NA, LLC v. Alger
834 So. 2d 408 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)