MacArthur Bros. Company v. . the City of New York
121 N.E. 877, 224 N.Y. 629, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1032
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Collin, Cuddeback, Pound and Crane, JJ. Dissenting as to seventh cause of action: Cardozo and Andrews, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
MacArthur Bros. Company v. . the City of New York, 121 N.E. 877, 224 N.Y. 629, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1032 (N.Y. 1918).
121 N.E. 877 (MacArthur Bros. Company v. . the City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brandt Corp. v. City of New York
199 N.E.2d 493 (New York Court of Appeals, 1964)
Trussell v. Rossi
38 Misc. 2d 829 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1963)
Ferro Concrete Construction Co. v. Kentucky Utilities Co.
205 F. Supp. 625 (E.D. Kentucky, 1962)
Buffalo Electric Co. v. State
27 Misc. 2d 527 (New York State Court of Claims, 1961)
Oakhill Contracting Co. v. City of New York
262 A.D. 530 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1941)
Cauldwell-Wingate Co. v. City of New York
252 A.D. 559 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)
Fredburn Construction Corp. v. City of New York
166 Misc. 120 (New York Supreme Court, 1937)
Oscar Daniels Co. v. City of New York
196 A.D. 856 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1921)