MacAffer v. Boston & Maine Railroad

197 N.E. 331, 268 N.Y. 408, 1935 N.Y. LEXIS 954
New York Court of Appeals·Decided July 11, 1935·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The adjudication that Mechanicville and Fort Edward Railroad Company had not legal capacity to sue made in the ejectment action of 1916 is binding and conclusive. Section 29 of the General Corporation Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 23; Laws of 1932, ch. 552) does not apply to a railroad corporation whose corporate powers had ceased ” even before dissolution.

The order of the Appellate Division and that of the Special Term should be reversed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, and the motion to dismiss granted.

The first certified question should be answered in the affirmative and the other question not answered.

Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ., concur.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MacAffer v. Boston & Maine Railroad, 197 N.E. 331, 268 N.Y. 408, 1935 N.Y. LEXIS 954 (N.Y. 1935).

197 N.E. 331 (MacAffer v. Boston & Maine Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Texaco (Puerto Rico) Inc. v. Secretario de Obras Públicas
85 P.R. Dec. 712 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1962)