MacAffer v. Boston & Maine Railroad

197 N.E. 331, 268 N.Y. 408, 1935 N.Y. LEXIS 954
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 11, 1935
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 197 N.E. 331 (MacAffer v. Boston & Maine Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MacAffer v. Boston & Maine Railroad, 197 N.E. 331, 268 N.Y. 408, 1935 N.Y. LEXIS 954 (N.Y. 1935).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The adjudication that Mechanicville and Fort Edward Railroad Company had not legal capacity to sue made in the ejectment action of 1916 is binding and conclusive. Section 29 of the General Corporation Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 23; Laws of 1932, ch. 552) does not apply to a railroad corporation whose corporate powers had ceased ” even before dissolution.

The order of the Appellate Division and that of the Special Term should be reversed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, and the motion to dismiss granted.

The first certified question should be answered in the affirmative and the other question not answered.

Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ., concur.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Texaco (Puerto Rico) Inc. v. Secretario de Obras Públicas
85 P.R. Dec. 712 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
197 N.E. 331, 268 N.Y. 408, 1935 N.Y. LEXIS 954, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/macaffer-v-boston-maine-railroad-ny-1935.