M. Brown & Co. v. Commissioner

9 B.T.A. 753, 1927 BTA LEXIS 2522
United States Board of Tax Appeals·Decided December 21, 1927·No. Docket No. 24864.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

[755] OPINION.

Littleton :

Petitioner was not subject to any additional tax under the Revenue Act of 1921 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1921, for which it duly filed a return prior to the approval of the Revenue Act of 1921. Under the law and the regulations, the petitioner was not required to file a second return. Fred T. Ley & Co., 9 B. T. A. 749.

The return filed by petitioner satisfied the provisions of the Revenue Act of 1921. The Commissioner had four years from the date of the filing of this return within which to determine and assess any additional tax for the taxable year. This four-year period expired in August, 1925. The assessment was not made until October, 1925, and the Commissioner’s final determination was not made until January 2, 1927. Collection of the deficiency is therefore barred by the statute of limitation.

Reviewed by the Boaed.

Judgment of no deficiency will ~be entered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

M. Brown & Co. v. Commissioner, 9 B.T.A. 753, 1927 BTA LEXIS 2522 (bta 1927).

9 B.T.A. 753 (M. Brown & Co. v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Myles Salt Co. v. Commissioner
18 B.T.A. 742 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1930)
Keystone Coal & Mining Co. v. Commissioner
10 B.T.A. 295 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1928)
M. Brown & Co. v. Commissioner
9 B.T.A. 753 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1927)