M. B. Dupree, D/B/A Dupree Gravel Company v. Gaubert Industries, Inc.

403 F.2d 207, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 4925
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedNovember 12, 1968
Docket25818_1
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 403 F.2d 207 (M. B. Dupree, D/B/A Dupree Gravel Company v. Gaubert Industries, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
M. B. Dupree, D/B/A Dupree Gravel Company v. Gaubert Industries, Inc., 403 F.2d 207, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 4925 (5th Cir. 1968).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an interlocutory appeal by plaintiff-appellant Dupree from an order cancelling a materialman’s lien on proceeds due defendant-appellee Gaubert Industries, Inc., from a public works project. The Louisiana statute, LSA-R.S. 38:2241 et seq., provides lien rights to those who supply materials to contractors or subcontractors but not to those who supply materials to material-men.

Dupree supplied sand and gravel to Gaubert for use in mixing concrete and delivering it in ready-mix concrete trucks to the job site pursuant to contract with Brown and Root, Inc!, the prime contractor. The sole issue here is whether Gaubert was a subcontractor and Dupree thus entitled to a lien under the statute, or whether Gaubert was a materialman and his supplier, Dupree, consequently not so entitled to a lien. *208 J. Watts Kearney & Sons v. Perry, 174 La. 411, 141 So. 13 (1932).

Where a supplier has the responsibility and is under the obligation to join in incorporating into the construction the materials he supplies, he has thus assumed a part of the contractor’s work and is a subcontractor. Jesse F. Heard & Sons v. Southwest Steel Products, 124 So.2d 211 (La.App.2d Cir. 1960). The lower court, after having heard the evidence, concluded that defendant Gaubert Industries, Inc., did not have this responsibility nor was it under this obligation. This finding is not clearly erroneous and accordingly the judgment of the district court is hereby

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

American Buildings Co. v. Wheelers Stores
585 P.2d 845 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1978)
United States v. Second National Bank of North Miami
502 F.2d 535 (Second Circuit, 1974)
George A. Fuller Co., Inc. v. VULCAN MAT. CO., SE DIV.
301 So. 2d 74 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
403 F.2d 207, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 4925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/m-b-dupree-dba-dupree-gravel-company-v-gaubert-industries-inc-ca5-1968.