Lyon v. Hussey

31 N.Y.S. 281, 82 Hun 15, 89 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 15
New York Supreme Court·Decided November 16, 1894·Published·Cited by 28 cases

Opinion

VAN BRUNT, P. J.

It may not be necessary to add anything to the opinion which was handed down upon the decision of the demurrer in the court below; but it may be proper to call attention to the fact that part of the contract, damages for the breach of which this action was brought to recover, was to furnish evidence to establish the claim of the defendant in a litigation to be commenced. It is clear that such a contract is against public policy. The recognition of contracts of this character would be the introduc[283]*283tion of all sorts of fraud and deception in proceedings before courts of justice, in order that parties might receive compensation out of the results of their successful manufacture of proofs to be presented to the court, thus holding out a premium upon subornation. The mere statement of the proposition seems to show that such a contract could never be recognized in any court of justice. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lyon v. Hussey, 31 N.Y.S. 281, 82 Hun 15, 89 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 15 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

31 N.Y.S. 281 (Lyon v. Hussey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shore v. Parklane Hosiery Co.
93 Misc. 2d 933 (New York Supreme Court, 1978)
Cartier v. Dutton
45 F.R.D. 278 (S.D. New York, 1965)
Marine Midland Trust Co. v. Forty Wall Street Corp.
13 A.D.2d 118 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1961)
Whelchel v. Stennett
5 So. 2d 418 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1942)
Bergoff Detective Service, Inc. v. Walters
239 A.D. 439 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1933)
Thatcher v. Darr
199 P. 938 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1921)
Hare v. McGue
174 P. 663 (California Supreme Court, 1918)
Johnson v. Higgins
108 A. 647 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1917)
People ex rel. Floersheimer v. Purdy
174 A.D. 694 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1916)
In re Acquiring Title by City of New York
144 A.D. 107 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)
In re Certain Lands in the Block Bounded by Aveune A & First Avenue
128 N.Y.S. 999 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)
Sheppy v. Stevens
185 F. 147 (N.D. New York, 1911)
Clifford v. Hughes
139 A.D. 730 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)
Breeden v. Frankford Marine, Accident & Plate Glass Insurance
119 S.W. 576 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1909)
State Electro-Medical Institute v. Platner
103 N.W. 1079 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1905)
Cowles v. . Rochester Folding Box Co.
71 N.E. 468 (New York Court of Appeals, 1904)
Laffin v. Billington
86 N.Y.S. 267 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1904)
Cowles v. Rochester Folding Box Co.
81 A.D. 414 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)
Langdon v. Conlin
60 L.R.A. 429 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1903)