Lynn v. Rogers

Tenth Circuit

Lynn v. Rogers

505 F.3d 1323, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 25968, 2007 WL 3277120

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided November 6, 2007·No. No. 07-3234·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

This is an appeal from a district court order dismissing appellant’s disciplinary complaints against four attorneys, Charles Rogers, Stephen G. Mirakian, Linden Ap-pel, and Julie St. Peter, and from an order denying appellant’s motion for reconsideration.

A private citizen does not have standing to initiate or maintain a disciplinary proceeding, or to appeal if a court declines to discipline an attorney. See, e.g., Mattice v. Meyer, 353 F.2d 316 (8th Cir.1965).

This appeal is DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This is an appeal from a district court order dismissing appellant’s disciplinary complaints against four attorneys, Charles Rogers, Stephen G. Mirakian, Linden Ap-pel, and Julie St. Peter, and from an order denying appellant’s motion for reconsideration.

A private citizen does not have standing to initiate or maintain a disciplinary proceeding, or to appeal if a court declines to discipline an attorney. See, e.g., Mattice v. Meyer, 353 F.2d 316 (8th Cir.1965).

This appeal is DISMISSED.

Lynn v. Rogers, 505 F.3d 1323, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 25968, 2007 WL 3277120 (10th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

505 F.3d 1323 (Lynn v. Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related