Lynn v. Rogers

Tenth Circuit

Lynn v. Rogers

505 F.3d 1323, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 25968, 2007 WL 3277120

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

DecidedNovember 6, 2007

DocketNo. 07-3234

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 505 F.3d 1323 (Lynn v. Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lynn v. Rogers, 505 F.3d 1323, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 25968, 2007 WL 3277120 (10th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

This is an appeal from a district court order dismissing appellant’s disciplinary complaints against four attorneys, Charles Rogers, Stephen G. Mirakian, Linden Ap-pel, and Julie St. Peter, and from an order denying appellant’s motion for reconsideration.

A private citizen does not have standing to initiate or maintain a disciplinary proceeding, or to appeal if a court declines to discipline an attorney. See, e.g., Mattice v. Meyer, 353 F.2d 316 (8th Cir.1965).

This appeal is DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This is an appeal from a district court order dismissing appellant’s disciplinary complaints against four attorneys, Charles Rogers, Stephen G. Mirakian, Linden Ap-pel, and Julie St. Peter, and from an order denying appellant’s motion for reconsideration.

A private citizen does not have standing to initiate or maintain a disciplinary proceeding, or to appeal if a court declines to discipline an attorney. See, e.g., Mattice v. Meyer, 353 F.2d 316 (8th Cir.1965).

This appeal is DISMISSED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

505 F.3d 1323, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 25968, 2007 WL 3277120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lynn-v-rogers-ca10-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack