Echols v. Ascione, Heideman & McKay

400 F. App'x 320
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided October 26, 2010·No. No. 10-4118·Published

Opinion

[321] ORDER

HARRIS L. HARTZ, Circuit Judge.

William L. Echols filed a complaint of attorney misconduct in the United States District Court for the District of Utah. The district court dismissed the complaint. Mr. Echols has filed a notice of appeal from that decision.

This court has held that “[a] private citizen does not have standing to initiate or maintain a disciplinary proceeding, or to appeal if a court declines to discipline an attorney.” In re Lynn, 505 F.3d 1323, 1324 (10th Cir.2007). Because Mr. Echols lacks standing to challenge on appeal the dismissal of his attorney-misconduct complaint, this appeal is DISMISSED. The pending “Appellant’s Application For Relief’ is also DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Echols v. Ascione, Heideman & McKay, 400 F. App'x 320 (10th Cir. 2010).

400 F. App'x 320 (Echols v. Ascione, Heideman & McKay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lynn v. Rogers
505 F.3d 1323 (Tenth Circuit, 2007)