Lyles v. State
This text of 117 So. 908 (Lyles v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Without going into a detailed discussion of the evidence, we hold that the facts and legal inferences to be drawn therefrom are sufficient to sustain the conviction. The facts in this case are easily distinguishable from the facts in those cases cited by appellant in his brief.
Refused charge 4 is an argument, and refused charge 5 is not predicated upon all of the evidence.
There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
117 So. 908, 22 Ala. App. 570, 1928 Ala. App. LEXIS 225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lyles-v-state-alactapp-1928.