Lyles v. State

117 So. 908, 22 Ala. App. 570, 1928 Ala. App. LEXIS 225
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 30, 1928
Docket8 Div. 672.
StatusPublished

This text of 117 So. 908 (Lyles v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lyles v. State, 117 So. 908, 22 Ala. App. 570, 1928 Ala. App. LEXIS 225 (Ala. Ct. App. 1928).

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

Without going into a detailed discussion of the evidence, we hold that the facts and legal inferences to be drawn therefrom are sufficient to sustain the conviction. The facts in this case are easily distinguishable from the facts in those cases cited by appellant in his brief.

Refused charge 4 is an argument, and refused charge 5 is not predicated upon all of the evidence.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
117 So. 908, 22 Ala. App. 570, 1928 Ala. App. LEXIS 225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lyles-v-state-alactapp-1928.