Lyles v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Lyles v. State

117 So. 908, 22 Ala. App. 570, 1928 Ala. App. LEXIS 225

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lyles v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 23 Ala. App. 135 →

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided June 30, 1928·No. 8 Div. 672.·Published

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

Without going into a detailed discussion of the evidence, we hold that the facts and legal inferences to be drawn therefrom are sufficient to sustain the conviction. The facts in this case are easily distinguishable from the facts in those cases cited by appellant in his brief.

Refused charge 4 is an argument, and refused charge 5 is not predicated upon all of the evidence.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, J.

Without going into a detailed discussion of the evidence, we hold that the facts and legal inferences to be drawn therefrom are sufficient to sustain the conviction. The facts in this case are easily distinguishable from the facts in those cases cited by appellant in his brief.

Refused charge 4 is an argument, and refused charge 5 is not predicated upon all of the evidence.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Lyles v. State, 117 So. 908, 22 Ala. App. 570, 1928 Ala. App. LEXIS 225 (Ala. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

117 So. 908 (Lyles v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.