Lyles v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Lyles v. State

105 So. 925, 21 Ala. App. 683

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 30, 1925

Docket7 Div. 90.

StatusPublished

This text of 105 So. 925 (Lyles v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lyles v. State, 105 So. 925, 21 Ala. App. 683 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

Upon being arraigned in the circuit court for the offense of violating the prohibition law, the defendant interposed a plea of guilty, whereupon the court assessed a fine of $50 against him, and also added 6 months’ hard labor for the county. From this judgment he appealed, notwithstanding his plea of guilty. This appeal is upon the record. There is no error, and the judgment of conviction is affinhed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

Upon being arraigned in the circuit court for the offense of violating the prohibition law, the defendant interposed a plea of guilty, whereupon the court assessed a fine of $50 against him, and also added 6 months’ hard labor for the county. From this judgment he appealed, notwithstanding his plea of guilty. This appeal is upon the record. There is no error, and the judgment of conviction is affinhed. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

105 So. 925, 21 Ala. App. 683, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lyles-v-state-alactapp-1925.