Lyles v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Lyles v. State

105 So. 925, 21 Ala. App. 683

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided June 30, 1925·No. 7 Div. 90.·Published

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

Upon being arraigned in the circuit court for the offense of violating the prohibition law, the defendant interposed a plea of guilty, whereupon the court assessed a fine of $50 against him, and also added 6 months’ hard labor for the county. From this judgment he appealed, notwithstanding his plea of guilty. This appeal is upon the record. There is no error, and the judgment of conviction is affinhed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

Upon being arraigned in the circuit court for the offense of violating the prohibition law, the defendant interposed a plea of guilty, whereupon the court assessed a fine of $50 against him, and also added 6 months’ hard labor for the county. From this judgment he appealed, notwithstanding his plea of guilty. This appeal is upon the record. There is no error, and the judgment of conviction is affinhed. Affirmed.

Lyles v. State, 105 So. 925, 21 Ala. App. 683 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

105 So. 925 (Lyles v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.