Luy v. Baltimore Police Department

Fourth Circuit

Luy v. Baltimore Police Department

120 F. App'x 465

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 1, 2005·No. 04-1994·Unpublished·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Sophal Luy appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil action against the Baltimore Police Department, Police Commissioner Kevin Clark, and Lieutenant Barbara Magnass. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Luy v. Baltimore Police Dep’t, No. CA-03-2833CCB (D. Md. July 16, 2004; July 29, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Sophal Luy appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil action against the Baltimore Police Department, Police Commissioner Kevin Clark, and Lieutenant Barbara Magnass. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Luy v. Baltimore Police Dep’t, No. CA-03-2833CCB (D. Md. July 16, 2004; July 29, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Luy v. Baltimore Police Department, 120 F. App'x 465 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

120 F. App'x 465 (Luy v. Baltimore Police Department) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related