Luy v. Baltimore Police Department
This text of 120 F. App'x 465 (Luy v. Baltimore Police Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Sophal Luy appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil action against the Baltimore Police Department, Police Commissioner Kevin Clark, and Lieutenant Barbara Magnass. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Luy v. Baltimore Police Dep’t, No. CA-03-2833CCB (D. Md. July 16, 2004; July 29, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
120 F. App'x 465, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luy-v-baltimore-police-department-ca4-2005.