Lutz v. MERCY MT. CLEMENS CORPORATION
727 N.W.2d 588, 477 Mich. 1034
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lutz v. MERCY MT. CLEMENS CORPORATION. Read the opinion of the Court — 477 Mich. 859 →
Opinion
Melissa LUTZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
MERCY MT. CLEMENS CORPORATION, d/b/a St. Joseph's Mercy of Macomb-Romeo Health Center, Raad Ausi, M.D., and Lydia C. Rozof, M.D., Defendants-Appellees, and
Sudarshan R. Reddy, M.D., Defendant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
*589 On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's September 20, 2006 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would grant reconsideration and, on reconsideration, would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lutz v. MERCY MT. CLEMENS CORPORATION, 727 N.W.2d 588, 477 Mich. 1034 (Mich. 2007).
727 N.W.2d 588 (Lutz v. MERCY MT. CLEMENS CORPORATION) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.