Lutz v. MERCY MT. CLEMENS CORPORATION

721 N.W.2d 169, 477 Mich. 859
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided September 20, 2006·No. 130849·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

721 N.W.2d 169 (2006)

Melissa LUTZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
MERCY MT. CLEMENS CORPORATION, d/b/a St. Joseph's Mercy of Macomb-Romeo Health Center, Raad Ausi, M.D., and Lydia C. Rozof, M.D., Defendants-Appellees, and
Sudarshan R. Reddy, M.D., Defendant.

Docket No. 130849. COA No. 261465.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

September 20, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 20, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH and MARILYN J. KELLY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lutz v. MERCY MT. CLEMENS CORPORATION, 721 N.W.2d 169, 477 Mich. 859 (Mich. 2006).

721 N.W.2d 169 (Lutz v. MERCY MT. CLEMENS CORPORATION) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Witcher
721 N.W.2d 169 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2006)