Lutz v. MERCY MT. CLEMENS CORPORATION
721 N.W.2d 169, 477 Mich. 859
This text of 721 N.W.2d 169 (Lutz v. MERCY MT. CLEMENS CORPORATION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lutz v. MERCY MT. CLEMENS CORPORATION, 721 N.W.2d 169, 477 Mich. 859 (Mich. 2006).
Opinion
Melissa LUTZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
MERCY MT. CLEMENS CORPORATION, d/b/a St. Joseph's Mercy of Macomb-Romeo Health Center, Raad Ausi, M.D., and Lydia C. Rozof, M.D., Defendants-Appellees, and
Sudarshan R. Reddy, M.D., Defendant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 20, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH and MARILYN J. KELLY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People v. Witcher
721 N.W.2d 169 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
721 N.W.2d 169, 477 Mich. 859, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lutz-v-mercy-mt-clemens-corporation-mich-2006.