Lurie v. APEX CLAYTON, INC.

258 S.W.3d 852, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 732, 2008 WL 2168938
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 27, 2008·No. ED 90443·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Nancy F. Lurie (“Lurie”) appeals the judgment of the trial court granting Apex Clayton, Inc. and 8182 Maryland Associates’ (collectively referred to herein as “defendants”) motion for summary judgment. Lurie claims the court erred in granting summary judgment because genuine issues of material fact exist, and her claims were not barred by the statute of limitations as set forth in section 516.120 RSMo (2000).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lurie v. APEX CLAYTON, INC., 258 S.W.3d 852, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 732, 2008 WL 2168938 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

258 S.W.3d 852 (Lurie v. APEX CLAYTON, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Marriage of Fisher
258 S.W.3d 852 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)