Lurie v. APEX CLAYTON, INC.

248 S.W.3d 82, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 145, 2008 WL 222312
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 29, 2008
DocketED 90017
StatusPublished

This text of 248 S.W.3d 82 (Lurie v. APEX CLAYTON, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lurie v. APEX CLAYTON, INC., 248 S.W.3d 82, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 145, 2008 WL 222312 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellants Ronald and Nancy Lurie appeal from the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of Respondents, Apex Clayton, Inc. and 8182 Maryland Associates. We have reviewed the briefs and the record, and we conclude that the trial court did not err. No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion reciting the facts and restating the law. A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Estate of Shuh
248 S.W.3d 82 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
248 S.W.3d 82, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 145, 2008 WL 222312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lurie-v-apex-clayton-inc-moctapp-2008.