Luppino v. Busher
This text of 97 A.D.2d 499 (Luppino v. Busher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
In a negligence action to recover damages for personal [500]*500injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Stolarik, J.), entered March 31, 1982, which was in favor of the defendants on the ground that the infant plaintiff did not suffer injury within the meaning of subdivision 4 of section 671 of the Insurance Law, after a special verdict that the injuries did not constitute a significant disfigurement. Judgment reversed, on the facts, and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. Although the issue of whether physical injury is “serious”, within the meaning of subdivision 4 of section 671 of the Insurance Law, is ordinarily a question of fact to be determined by the jury (see, e.g., Simone v Streeben, 56 AD2d 237, 239), the special verdict in this case was against the weight of the credible evidence. Accordingly, a new trial is granted (see Graham v Pokur Packing, 49 AD2d 938). Mollen, P. J., Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
97 A.D.2d 499, 468 N.Y.S.2d 17, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20096, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luppino-v-busher-nyappdiv-1983.