Lundy v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lundy v. State

156 So. 3d 583, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 1180, 2015 WL 376401

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 30, 2015

DocketNo. 5D14-1999

StatusPublished

This text of 156 So. 3d 583 (Lundy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lundy v. State, 156 So. 3d 583, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 1180, 2015 WL 376401 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Amiri Lundy appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. In that motion, Lundy alleged separate claims numbered one through nine. Our review of the Order reveals that as to claims numbered one through four and claim number eight, the records attached do not refute Lundy’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. We, therefore, reverse that part of the Order under review summarily denying claims one, two, three, four, and eight and remand for an evidentiary hearing. In all other respects, the Order is affirmed.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.

TORPY, C.J., SAWAYA and BERGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Amiri Lundy appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. In that motion, Lundy alleged separate claims numbered one through nine. Our review of the Order reveals that as to claims numbered one through four and claim number eight, the records attached do not refute Lundy’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. We, therefore, reverse that part of the Order under review summarily denying claims one, two, three, four, and eight and remand for an evidentiary hearing. In all other respects, the Order is affirmed.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.

TORPY, C.J., SAWAYA and BERGER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

156 So. 3d 583, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 1180, 2015 WL 376401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lundy-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.