Lundy v. State

88 So. 3d 359, 2012 WL 1605323, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7226
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 9, 2012
DocketNo. 3D12-757
StatusPublished

This text of 88 So. 3d 359 (Lundy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lundy v. State, 88 So. 3d 359, 2012 WL 1605323, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7226 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Little v. State, 77 So.3d 722, 722-23 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (holding that “section 893.13, as amended by section 893.101, Florida Statutes (2002), is constitutional”; rejecting Shelton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, 802 F.Supp.2d 1289, 1308 (M.D.Fla.2011), in which federal court held that section 893.13, Florida Statutes (2004), “violates the due process clause and that the statute is unconstitutional on its face”); Ortega v. State, 76 So.3d 346 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); see also State v. Adkins, 71 So.3d 184 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011), review granted, 71 So.3d 117 (Fla.2011).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ortega v. State
76 So. 3d 346 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Little v. State
77 So. 3d 722 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
State v. Adkins
71 So. 3d 184 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Shelton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
802 F. Supp. 2d 1289 (M.D. Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 So. 3d 359, 2012 WL 1605323, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lundy-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.