Lummis v. White

Fifth Circuit

Lummis v. White

686 F.2d 225

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 26, 1982·No. No. 79-2898·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before VANCE and FRANK D. JOHNSON, Jr., Circuit Judges, and THOMAS,** District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

The Supreme Court,-U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 2325, 72 L.Ed.2d 694, having held that the eleventh amendment bars the statutory interpleader sought in this case, the judgment of the district court, 491 F.Supp. 5, dismissing the action is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before VANCE and FRANK D. JOHNSON, Jr., Circuit Judges, and THOMAS,** District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

The Supreme Court,-U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 2325, 72 L.Ed.2d 694, having held that the eleventh amendment bars the statutory interpleader sought in this case, the judgment of the district court, 491 F.Supp. 5, dismissing the action is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

Lummis v. White, 686 F.2d 225 (5th Cir. 1982).

Pincite

686 F.2d 225 (Lummis v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related