Lumbley v. Gilruth

65 Miss. 23
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1887·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Campbell, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court..

The. landlord did not advance anything to his tenant within the meaning of § 1301 of the Code. He forebore to compel delivery of the corn or payment for it, and agreed that the tenant might pay at the end of the next year. To constitute “ advance,” the landlord must furnish, or cause to be furnished, something not before the tenant’s, and mere forbearance to demand something due him from the tenant in one year, does not give him a lien on the agricultural products of the leased premises for the next year, as. against one who has a deed of trust embracing them, whatever may be his right as against the tenant. The corn due from the tenant was not delivered, but continued to be his property, and the transaction between him and the landlord amounted to no more than forbear-’ anee to demand what was due.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lumbley v. Gilruth, 65 Miss. 23 (Mich. 1887).

65 Miss. 23 (Lumbley v. Gilruth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Life Ins. Co. of Ind. v. Hardy
195 So. 708 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1940)
Sprouse v. Davis
106 So. 824 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1926)