Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company v. Babcock & Wilcox Company

Ninth Circuit

Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company v. Babcock & Wilcox Company

366 F.2d 187

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 12, 1966·No. 20789_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The sole, question presented by this appeal is whether the trial court’s findings of fact are clearly erroneous within the meaning of Rule 52(a) F.R.Civ.P., as construed and applied by us in Lundgren v. Freeman, 9 Cir., 1962, 307 F.2d 104, 113-115. We have carefully examined the transcript of the testimony, the depositions that were received in evidence, and the written exhibits, and we conclude that the court’s findings are not clearly erroneous.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The sole, question presented by this appeal is whether the trial court’s findings of fact are clearly erroneous within the meaning of Rule 52(a) F.R.Civ.P., as construed and applied by us in Lundgren v. Freeman, 9 Cir., 1962, 307 F.2d 104, 113-115. We have carefully examined the transcript of the testimony, the depositions that were received in evidence, and the written exhibits, and we conclude that the court’s findings are not clearly erroneous.

Affirmed.

Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company v. Babcock & Wilcox Company, 366 F.2d 187 (9th Cir. 1966).

Pincite

366 F.2d 187 (Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company v. Babcock & Wilcox Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related