Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company v. Babcock & Wilcox Company

Ninth Circuit

Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company v. Babcock & Wilcox Company

366 F.2d 187

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 12, 1966

Docket20789_1

StatusPublished

This text of 366 F.2d 187 (Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company v. Babcock & Wilcox Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company v. Babcock & Wilcox Company, 366 F.2d 187 (9th Cir. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The sole, question presented by this appeal is whether the trial court’s findings of fact are clearly erroneous within the meaning of Rule 52(a) F.R.Civ.P., as construed and applied by us in Lundgren v. Freeman, 9 Cir., 1962, 307 F.2d 104, 113-115. We have carefully examined the transcript of the testimony, the depositions that were received in evidence, and the written exhibits, and we conclude that the court’s findings are not clearly erroneous.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The sole, question presented by this appeal is whether the trial court’s findings of fact are clearly erroneous within the meaning of Rule 52(a) F.R.Civ.P., as construed and applied by us in Lundgren v. Freeman, 9 Cir., 1962, 307 F.2d 104, 113-115. We have carefully examined the transcript of the testimony, the depositions that were received in evidence, and the written exhibits, and we conclude that the court’s findings are not clearly erroneous.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

366 F.2d 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lumbermens-mutual-casualty-company-v-babcock-wilcox-company-ca9-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack