Lum v. United States

22 C.M.A. 668
CourtUnited States Court of Military Appeals
DecidedNovember 15, 1973
DocketNo. 73-60
StatusPublished

This text of 22 C.M.A. 668 (Lum v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lum v. United States, 22 C.M.A. 668 (cma 1973).

Opinion

On consideration of the "Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, and/or Mandamus, and/or other Appropriate Relief’ filed in the above-entitled action it appearing that the decision to defer service of a sentence to confinement rests in the sole discretion of the convening authority, and it further appearing that said petition does not indicate an abuse of that discretion in this instance, it is, by the Court, this 15th day of November 1973,

ORDERED:

That said petition be, and the same hereby is, dismissed.

Chief Judge Darden would dismiss the petition because the relief sought is not in aid of this Court’s jurisdiction. 28 USC § 1651(a).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Writs
28 U.S.C. § 1651(a)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 C.M.A. 668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lum-v-united-states-cma-1973.