Luis Carlos Rodriguez v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 9, 2016
Docket01-14-00774-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Luis Carlos Rodriguez v. State (Luis Carlos Rodriguez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Luis Carlos Rodriguez v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Appellate case name: Luis Carlos Rodriguez v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-14-00774-CR

Trial court case number: 07-DCR-046309

Trial court: 240th District Court of Fort Bend County

Appellant, Luis Carlos Rodriguez, has filed a Motion to Abate Appeal For Entry of Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Regarding denials of Motion to Suppress. The State filed a response to the motion. The motion is GRANTED. We abate the appeal and remand for the trial court to enter written findings of fact and conclusions of law, separate and apart from any docket sheet notations in this case, in conjunction with the trial court’s denial of Evans’s motion to suppress. See State v. Cullen, 195 S.W.3d 696, 699 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (holding that trial court must provide findings of fact and conclusions of law adequate to provide appellate court with basis to review trial court’s application of law to facts, either in writing or on record at hearing); Wicker v. State, 740 S.W.2d 779, 784 (Tex. Crim. App. 1987); TEX. R. APP. P. 44.4. The trial court shall make the appropriate findings and conclusions and shall cause them to be filed with the trial court clerk within 20 days of the date of this order. We further order the trial court clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law with this Court within 30 days of the date of this order. Appellant will be permitted to file an amended brief within 30 days after the supplemental clerk’s record is filed in this Court.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown  Acting individually

Date: February 9, 2016

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Cullen
195 S.W.3d 696 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2006)
Wicker v. State
740 S.W.2d 779 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Luis Carlos Rodriguez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luis-carlos-rodriguez-v-state-texapp-2016.