Luis Carlos Rodriguez v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 11, 2015·No. 01-14-00774-CR·Published

Opinion

loF I

Cfo vls4oplr>er, Clerk , FILED IN ls+ Courf o* Appeals "SXggf 301 Fannin SEP 11 2015 H©us+or\, Texas 1700Z'lO66 cwwophb, ^ ^ CLERK

Sep+cwker 8; 2-015

Coor4 oF Appeals Monger t Ol-l/\~0077^-C&k

D ear ? S ir

QJi+n qll Jo re£pec4 my <\ame. is Lu'»S Carlos 'ftocJHouez- on appeals For tK 4Kere ar>y ckav\ce you ca^ se^d <*c a copv| oF my Trial 4-v-qnscr 1p4s , «f be c?Aly 4k<. repor4er's record? Oac) tF you could asK my 4rtal (aouyer , Mt Jqms'S S4everi5 , »F Vn WFov-^. \x±\ 4o r\<3 0.vq\1 , I as\qr\T to Send me vxo^kmQ omd AAr. S4epk<2*\ Ke. do no4 *uu<3f\+ 4o i/\ Formed to

because my Qppeua-rc- ffTTOri^co ,ke. say , ctll oP kke v\o4ices From ike Appeals uuere be.ir»a Scao 4o you 4mictt CooASel , TamcS ^ie\/<2A^; I Wave t>&e.v\ cpve c* ©O day exTenSlon From Joly 16,2,0(5 , 40 File. yo»jr brieF. X uuaS m »or4 bend Covat-u ZJcul .For r ye&ys, r mo^ks,l^ days o\r*A4 ^ca/nce be-Fore ^t ca4 ke> 4rio.l , 4key in couato For f y&xrs, t ^rhontks, 16 octyjS <*rty Leopl wr\44«n ao4i ^ed 4ko.4- Cv/tdeAce *^ my COSe oF Cap tto! Murder kots (sefiA des4»-oyeo 1 ve be<2A Fqfeejy accused c»Ad c©Avic4ed For Cosptroii Murder ^»veA 1'iFe uj»4kout Parole , X explain 4o mo nppe^0b4e ft44ryev UJko.4 ^ 4he recti problem uJifk my cftSc , ujky 4l\e Tv>doe Tko^QS k- Culver"HI , fU DiV|>«e4 A44ov-Aey a*vd "iy 4k*ol Laojye^ Jiv To*n<»«j Sr«sie*\ , -rkco des4royc(\ video Aobo<^ K^ouj 4-^4- cc: 30F

u4 4ke real pro bWm X 4o Id 4c> »^y 4ria\ LAOjyer Mr O^AAeS ^-tcak-as o»\d to my /4ppe-llo>4e $44orr\ey S4epkeA A-l)o^C.44 4ka_ copy's 4key m&de-V4 From rke. oriqmoj! ~bVl) vice oF 4ke lA-kerv'ievjJ tt^d 4ke oriamal s4q4e/heA4 .do ao4 skouo up evejro4k»AQ We Scald aw3 we did , 4-ke day oF 4f\e iA4erroaa4-ioA , 4ke copy's 4key made «4 do no4 skovo up 4epken , ke 4ola me- "rke appeals is boused oa 4ke clerK. ar\d Cooir4 reporter's record/ So 4kere ,"s ^olkino uOo coa 4e\l Ave 4kci4 X CaA OS& m 4kd, appe.ql -i ' yoc u/Qrt'f, u'ri+e, «^C to & c*" ^V dafeASe F»ie. , umy 4k®y «oAore0-f 'K*<&p>i*<\ /i»"» Glppnszd <>P O/Aqf '5 Ao^ptz^tnet //) A/3 COSe or uAqV e-videAee a asms 4 ki«n »«b iF 4koF 15 accurate , I cwn , m o4^\~ ouord^ , laAOv'mc, W«S CaSe e*v 4k«Jr m4e»\4\o Aqlly or Aeglio^w^ly oa<} a©4- Weepvfvc. 1m«*\ i^Fov-v^sd oF 4R^ sFaTos cF ki$ Ca.$e , X 4old .Mr 3am«:s S4eve.As X ^o ao"F uoaA4~ y>ou "»"o re.p^eScAT *v\c. oA appe.ql X OJeis aoX pleased ^ "Ay 4rial , X Have F»W d previous ccmpla^A+s a^aiA«4 you , X4- is nor <$ ,/iy b&s-r //iierve5 S4evens , ke do ao4- uooa4 4o waive FrorA /ny case aAd \*jka4 koipp^Amci

C Rodr i g±jez. I n le HeF5

Uouj ,my Appellate. fifloMey , Ae t4 /s©l oecQVSe, -Me Ju»Ji»e. TkoA^as Pv- CvW HL , 4kc 'b-A , 4k«. 1)ed4ec4u/es ^nd ^\y 4ria( Lau^yer 4oo, tAeu sc&cj and save.c) and /o*>t evictee, or //^ jee^e or ras. cr •/*<£., FAey orQvqhr A^/se uj\4-nesS€.s to re^reFy qqo»/ist /r>e , 4s.caa£e rAgt^ ^/i/<2 er q Fq.ls/e ' 1 "/e/1/" o«* ci-f~foA , -Z* asFused h tq (K uj ii k 4Ae 7)efee f (v/e3 ujT 4/i oo+ TAe phe.se./\ce.$ °^ a Laujyer out rhe.u 'rale/ /t^e tIqT / r X c//V ^a"f t**lK S^ ujqs o.UTo/^cn4i" -sAoytf /T , 7/e (ITCA/icW, -Mec/ KapT ov\ "ralKmcj . X *-

And 4k«2.y re,Fuse m'ojh q s4ok4cme(A4 , ujkey\ X reFu2>ed 4-o Sf'aA because X 4old {ket^i 4k<\4- u^aS \A c^A^dsh ,ouk tck I o4 WFov*. 4key ^\ad\aS m* Far 4- ^rjen<) Court 4^ 3V\\ Fo\r 7 ylrs y~2>"voa4I\s , U

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luis Carlos Rodriguez v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Luis Carlos Rodriguez v. State (Luis Carlos Rodriguez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.